Brevio vs CaseIntel: an honest comparison for small firms
Both bring AI to eDiscovery for small firms. Here's where each wins — on pricing, defensibility, and the features that decide a case.
All competitor details below come from that vendor's public site as of May 2026. Pricing and features change fast with new tools — if anything here is stale, tell us and we'll correct it.
If you run a solo or small litigation practice, you've probably narrowed your AI eDiscovery search to a handful of tools that actually publish their pricing and let you sign up without a sales call. CaseIntel and Brevio are both on that short list. They look similar from the outside — AI on every document, deposition help, a chat assistant over your case. They diverge sharply on two things that matter when a production goes out the door: what it costs to get started, and what you can prove if opposing counsel challenges your process.
Here's the honest version.
Who each tool is for
CaseIntelis built around AI “agents” — an opposition-brief analyzer, contract redlining, a RAG chat assistant, deposition-prep automation. It's a strong fit if your day-to-day is brief-heavy and you want AI co-pilots across the matter, and if a two-seat minimum fits how your firm is staffed.
Brevio is built around court-ready defensibility— the assumption that anything your AI touches may have to survive a challenge. It's the better fit if you're a true solo, if you produce to opposing counsel and need the chain of custody to hold, or if you run TAR and need real metrics behind it.
Side by side
| Feature | Brevio$99/mo | CaseIntel$258/mo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing & access | ||
| Entry price | $99/mo | $258/mo (2-seat min) |
| Public pricing, no sales call | Yes | Yes |
| Free trialHow you try it before paying | Self-serve signup | 14-day, no card |
| SOC 2 | Type II audit Q3 2026 | — |
| Court-ready defensibility | ||
| TAR with Grossman-Cormack defensibility metricsThe recall/precision numbers a court asks about | YesCAL / TAR 2.0 | — |
| Attorney-directed AI / coding separationKeeps AI suggestions from co-mingling with final coding | Yes | — |
| Tamper-evident defensibility report (SHA-256 verified) | YesEvery production | — |
| Two-stage privilege quarantine | YesCollector pre-screen + AI upgrade | — |
| Legal holds with signed acknowledgment portal | Yes | — |
| Full deposition workflow (transcript parsing)Veritext PDF/TXT → page-line summaries → exhibit linking | Yes | PartialPrep automation, no transcript parsing documented |
| AI & review | ||
| AI relevance scoring | YesAttorney-directed | YesRelevance Classifier |
| AI privilege detection | YesTwo-stage, attorney roster | — |
| RAG Q&A with citations | YesInvestigation Assistant | YesAsk AI |
| Audio / video transcription | Roadmap | — |
| Always-on / agentic AI | Roadmap | YesAI Agents |
| Collection | ||
| Native Slack / Teams collection | Yes | — |
| Cloud collectors (Gmail, Microsoft 365) | YesTeam tier | — |
“—” means not publicly documented as of the date noted, not that the vendor lacks the feature. All competitor data is from each vendor's public site; figures change — see the live comparison or verify with the vendor.
Where CaseIntel wins today
Let's be fair. CaseIntel ships things Brevio is still building, and if these decide your matter, you should weigh them:
- Opposition-brief analyzer and contract redliningas packaged AI agents. Brevio's AI is aimed at review, privilege, and depositions, not brief or contract analysis.
- A polished, AI-agent-first experience out of the box, with a 14-day no-credit-card trial.
Brevio is also still catching up on a few demo-stage features industry-wide: audio/video transcription, a tabular bulk-AI extraction grid, and a multi-monitor pop-out viewerare on our roadmap, not shipped yet. If one of those is a hard requirement this month, ask us and we'll tell you straight whether we're there — see the honest gaps on our comparison page.
Where Brevio wins
Brevio's advantage shows up the moment your work has to be defended, not just done:
- TAR with real metrics. Brevio runs technology-assisted review with control sets and Grossman-Cormack defensibility metrics — the recall, precision, and richness numbers a court actually asks about. CaseIntel publishes no TAR defensibility metrics.
- A tamper-evident defensibility report. Every Brevio production can ship with a frozen, SHA-256-verified report documenting your process end to end — the thing you hand opposing counsel so the conversation is about the documents, not your methodology. See a real one →
- A real deposition workflow.Brevio parses Veritext PDFs and plain-text transcripts into page-line-indexed records, generates page-line summaries, and auto-links exhibits with a confirm/reject step. CaseIntel markets “deposition prep automation” but publishes no transcript parsing.
- Two-stage privilege quarantineso a privileged document can't slip into a production by accident — caught at collection, re-checked by AI.
Pricing, with a real example
A solo lawyer with one active matter:
- Brevio Solo: $99/mo × 12 = $1,188/year, one seat, all of the above included.
- CaseIntel: the 2-seat minimum means $258/mo even as a solo → $3,096/yearat the $129 tier, before any SSO add-on. As a solo you're paying for a seat you don't use.
For a true solo, that's roughly a 2.6× differenceat entry — and Brevio's defensibility substrate is included, not an upsell.
The bottom line
If your work is brief- and contract-heavy and you staff at least two people, CaseIntel's agent suite is worth a look. If you're a solo, if price-per-seat matters, or if you ever have to prove your process held up — TAR metrics, a tamper-evident defensibility report, real deposition tooling — Brevio is built for exactly that, starting at $99.
See the full four-way breakdown on our comparison page, read how the defensibility report works, or start your free trial.
Comparing Brevio to Hintyr instead? Read that one →